Part 2
The above statement is not meant to criticize anyone’s knowledge. It is intended to inform Baptists who might be opposed to Elders on the (supposed) grounds that Elders in Baptist churches has no historicity among Baptists.
The following is a list of Baptists who defended the practice of Elders in Baptist churches:
―Benjamin Keach wrote of “Bishops, Overseers, or Elders”, 16971
―Benjamin Griffith wrote in favor of ruling elders distinct from the pastors or teaching elders (18th century)2
―Samuel Jones of the Philadelphia Association wrote that “Concerning the divine right of the office of ruling elders there has been considerable doubt and much disputation (19th century)3
―W. B. Johnson, first president of the Southern Baptist Convention, writing of New Testament churches, each church had a plurality of elders.4
―J. L. Reynolds, pastor of the Second Baptist Church of Richmond, Virginia, wrote in 1849 that the apostolic churches seem, in general, to have had a plurality of elders as well as deacons.5
―William Williams, one of the founding faculty of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary wrote in 1874 that In most, if not all the apostolic churches, there was a plurality of elders.6
―There was a plurality of elders in C. H. Spurgeon’s Metropolitan Tabernacle in London7
―A. H. Strong, president of Rochester Theological Seminary, and author of his influential 1907 Systematic Theology summarizes the positions most Baptists in America seemed to hold at the beginning of the 20th century’ In certain of the N.T. churches there appears to have been a plurality of elders…8
Baptist documents also testify to the historic practice of Elders:
―1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith, A particular church, gathered and completely organized according to the mind of Christ, consists of officers and members; and the officers appointed by Christ to be chosen and set apart by the church (so called and gathered), for the peculiar administration of ordinances, and execution of power or duty, which he intrusts them with, or calls them, to be continued to the end of the world, are bishops or elders, and deacons.9
―Basil Manly, Jr. stated in 1859, The regular officers of a church are Bishops or Elders, and Deacons.10
―The Baptist Faith and Message, 1925, …Scriptural officers are bishops or elders and deacons.11
―Herschel Hobbs, who chaired the 1963 revision committee of the Baptist Faith and Message, wrote in 1964, Pastor—this is one of three titles referring to the same office. The other two are ‘bishop’ and ‘elder.12
The Bible testifies to the historic doctrine of Elders: (All texts are from the original 1611 KJV, the Bible cherished by Baptists)
―Then the disciples, euery man according to his abilitie, determined to send reliefe vnto the brethren which dwelt in Iudea. Which also they did, and sent it to the Elders by the hands of Barnabas and Saul, Acts 11:29,30
―And when they had ordeined them Elders in euery Church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, on whom they beleeued, Acts 14:23
―And certaine men which came downe from Iudea, taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saued. 2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissention and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certeine other of them, should goe vp to Hierusalem vnto the Apostles and Elders about this question. And being brought on their way by the Church, they passed thorow Phenice and Samaria, declaring the conuersion of the Gentiles: and they caused great ioy vnto all the brethren. And when they were come to Hierusalem, they were receiued of the Church, and of the Apostles, and Elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them, Acts 15: 1-4
―Then pleased it the Apostles and Elders with the whole Church, to send chosen men of their owne company to Antioch, with Paul and Barnabas: namely, Iudas surnamed Barsabas, & Silas, chiefe men among the brethren, And wrote letters by them after this maner, The Apostles and Elders, and brethren, send greeting vnto the brethren, which are of the Gentiles in Antioch, and Syria, and Cilicia, Acts 15: 22,23
―And as they went through the cities, they deliuered them the decrees for to keepe, that were ordeined of the Apostles and Elders, which were at Hierusalem. And so were the Churches established in the faith, and increased in number dayly, Acts 16:4,5
―And from Miletus hee sent to Ephesus, and called the Elders of the Church, Acts 20:17
―And when we were come to Hierusalem, the brethren receiued vs gladly And the day following Paul went in with vs vnto Iames, and all the Elders were present, Acts 21:17,18
―Let the Elders that rule well, be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine. For the Scripture saith, Thou shalt not mousell the oxe that treadeth out the corne: and, The labourer is worthy of his reward. Against an Elder receiue not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses, 1 Timothy 5:17-19
―For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordaine Elders in euery citie, as I had appointed thee, Titus 1:5
―Is any sicke among you? let him call for the Elders of the Church, and let them pray ouer him, anointing him with oyle in the Name of the Lord: And the prayer of Faith shall saue the sicke, and the Lord shall raise him vp: and if hee haue committed sinnes, they shall be forgiuen him, James 5:14,15
―The Elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an Elder, and a witnesse of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be reuealed, 1 Peter 5:1
The historicity of Elders in Baptist churches is supported by documents dating back to the 17th century and examples from Baptists extending thru the 20th century. The evidence cannot be either misunderstood or given some vague and ambiguous alternative understanding. Furthermore, the testimony of Scripture is clear that Elders are to be ordained in all churches (congregations) and since Baptists are people of the Bible, …we cannot be Baptists without the Bible, we must know personally for ourselves, what order of obedience it requires at our hands13, Baptists must settle the issue of Elder led churches based on the facts of Holy Scripture and the numerous historic examples by Baptists throughout history. Our historic documents relied upon the authority of Scripture to determine the correct use of Elders in Baptist churches and we must not allow our traditions and the lack of knowledge of our own Baptist history determine the issue of Elders in Baptist churches.
If the argument against Elders in Baptist churches is settled based upon the absence of Baptist history, the argument fails. If the argument against Elders in Baptist churches is settled based upon the absence of clear Biblical evidence, the argument fails.
Footnotes:
1 Benjamin Keach,
The Glory of a True Church, in Polity, ed. Mark Dever (Washington, DC; 2001), p. 65.
2 Benjamin Griffith,
A Short Treatise, Mark Dever, ed.,
Polity, p. 98.
3 Samuel Jones,
Treatise of Church Discipline, Mark Dever,
Polity, pp. 145-146.
4 W. B. Johnson,
The Gospel Developed, Mark Dever,
Polity, p. 192.
5 J. L. Reynolds,
Church Polity or the Kingdom of Christ, Mark Dever, ed.,
Polity, p. 349.
6 William Williams,
Apostolical Church Polity, Mark Dever, ed.,
Polity, p. 531.
7 The Church Conservative and Aggressive The Metropolitan TabernActsle Pulpit, volume 7, pp. 658-659.
8 A. H. Strong,
Systematic Theology, pp. 915-916.
9 chapter 26, paragraph 8
10 AbstrActst of Principles, Article 14.
11 Article 12.
12 Herschel H. Hobbs,
What Baptists Believe, (Broadman Press, 1964) p. 85.
13 Thomas Armitage, D.D.,
Three Great Foundation Principles, taken from
Baptist Doctrine, 1892